By Michel Arrivé
If you happen to learn or reread Freud, it really is tricky to not locate on a unmarried web page references to language: from speech to textual content, from slip of the tongue to be aware play, from letter to meaning-passing unavoidably throughout the unusual suggestion of literal meaning, that interested Freud. briefly, the subconscious is associated with language. How may perhaps or not it's differently, if psychoanalysis is a therapy via speech as indicated as early as 1881, by means of Fraülein Anna O.? the matter of the connection among linguistic and psychoanalytic suggestions inevitably arises. formerly this query has been tested generally via psychoanalysts, from their very own standpoint, yet the following it's investigated by means of a linguist, who systematically explores domain names. the 1st is expounded to the sign and symbol, the place the assembly of Freud, Saussure and Hjelmselv ocurred; while within the moment, that of the signifier, Saussure reappears escorted by means of Lacan. yet Freud isn't really far-off, sine the Lacanian conception of the signifier is rooted not just in Saussure's Cours, but in addition within the Metapsychology and in Freud's Correspondence with Fliess. To aspire to resolve this knot, in truth corresponds to try a analyzing of the Lacanian aphorism “the subconscious is established like a language”.
Read or Download Linguistics and Psychoanalysis: Freud, Saussure, Hjelmslev, Lacan and others (Semiotic Crossroads) PDF
Best psychology & counseling books
The booklet starts off with the matter of the connection among systematic philosophy and the background of philosophy. Why does philosophy connect rather a lot value to background? attention of this query is a necessary a part of metaphysics, and it has very important effects for the method of either historical past and philosophy.
El presente libro constituye una compilación de trabajos consagrados a los problemas filosóficos más importantes relativos al pensamiento y al lenguaje. El libro ha sido preparado bajo los angeles dirección de Dimitri Pavlovich Gorski.
Origen del lenguaje y su papel en los angeles formación del pensamiento (A. G. Spirkin)
Lenguaje y conocimiento (D. P. Gorski)
Acerca de l. a. correlación existente entre el lenguaje y el pensamiento (V. Z. Panfílov)
Las formas lógicas y su expresión en el lenguaje (A. S. Ajmánov)
La palabra y el concepto (V. M. Boguslavski)
La naturaleza del juicio y sus formas de expresión en el lenguaje (P. V. Kopnin)
La forma y el contenido en el lenguaje (E. M. Gálkina-Fedoruk)
A gaggle of difficulties that looks conspicuously within the current quantity, and in up to now contributes to the health of its name, has got a substantial curiosity at the a part of the general public at huge. Such curiosity turns out liable to take its clue from the job of these who usher in startling revelations at the foundation of bizarre psychic reports, and who provide promise of revealing different worlds than the single with which good judgment and customary sensation acquaint us, instead of from the wary and constant result of critical scholars in examine or in laboratory.
How do we, analysts, evaluation no matter if research is producing variations in our sufferers? Time for swap: monitoring variations in Psychoanalyses. The Three-Level version makes a speciality of the query of the way to watch alterations in psychoanalysis. The IPA venture Committee on medical remark and checking out deals a device, a heuristic, or a advisor for refining, conceptualizing, and systematizing medical observations approximately sufferer alterations: The Three-Level version for gazing sufferer changes (3-LM).
- Biologic Regulation of Physical Activity
- Forensic Psychology
- The MMPI, MMPI-2 & MMPI-A in Court: A Practical Guide for Expert Witnesses and Attorneys, 3rd Edition
- Clinician’s Guide to Adult ADHD Comorbidities: Case Studies
- Maternal Substance Abuse and the Developing Nervous System
- Writing to Clients and Referring Professionals about Psychological Assessment Results: A Handbook of Style and Grammar
Extra info for Linguistics and Psychoanalysis: Freud, Saussure, Hjelmslev, Lacan and others (Semiotic Crossroads)
One characteristic of the symbol is that it is never wholly arbitrary; it is not empty, for there is the rudiment of a natural bond between the signifier and the signified. The symbol of justice, a pair of scales, could not be replaced by any other symbol, such as a chariot" (CGL, p. 101; 68). Thus the idea that the linguistic sign (and/or signifier) and the symbol are in fact equivalent is challenged by a consideration of one of the meanings of the word symbol This definition of the symbol, which we see here in Saussure's example of the scales as symbol (or, as we saw above, as sign or signifier 4) of justice has been traditionally formulated in the following way: "that which represents something else by means of an analogical correspondance" (Lalande, 1926, see symbol).
This text is cited by Tullio de Mauro in the critical edition of the CGL, p. 445). There are two significant differences between the attitude quoted in the passage above and the attitude to be found in the CGL. As far as the theory of the sign is concerned, the substitution of the "concept" (here: the "idea", then later the "mind") for the "thing" (here: "the object") which we will find later in the CGL (p. 98) has not yet been effected. ). As far as terminology is concerned, symbol is here qualified by conventional, which the language of the CGL will later make quite impossible.
For is it possible to reconcile the intentionality of the symbol with the impossibility of uncovering this intentionality? We have seen that Saussure clearly wishes to prove the former but states with seeming satisfaction that the latter is impossible. And what is the link between the content of the theoretical discourse and the "figurative" way in which it is expressed? Reading these figures "literally", as is legitimate and as Saussure invites us to, it is possible to see in these figures a second discourse undermining the first, one which ascribes to the symbol precisely those characteristics which are not ascribed to it in the theoretical text.